AUA recommends 51798 any time
ultrasound is performed to check for residual urine
Q
We use the BVI-3000 BladderScan from Diagnostic Ultrasound for residual urine.
They show a shadow of amount left in the bladder on a printed report. Is this
still considered a non-image? Is there any way we can use 76775 using the
BVI-3000?
A
76775 is the appropriate code to use for a B scan or real-time ultrasound
image, according to CPT. However, AUA has specifically stated that it recommends
using code 51798 any time ultrasound is performed to check for residual urine.
Q
Regarding your article in the February 2003 issue of Urology Times ("New
residual urine code will be for non-imaging US only," page 40), you
recommend billing CPT 76775 for imaging ultrasounds for post-void residual.
However, the Virginia Local Medical Review Policy states that the use of
handheld ultrasonic devices to determine post-void residual bladder volume is
not reimbursable by this code. What should the dictation include to
substantiate charging CPT 76775 for PVR?
A
First, see the discussion above for coding recommendations.
"Handheld" was probably intended to imply non-imaging.
The dictation to substantiate 76775
should include a complete separate dictation, official radiological style, to
include the architecture of the bladder, the bladder wall, etc. The complete
pelvic organs do not need to be discussed, since this is a limited exam. The
report should be separate from your office progress note or operative note.
Important
update: Coding of residual ultrasound
In my February 2003 column (page 40), I
discussed the new 51798 ultrasound code and the fact that CPT had specifically
stated it applied to non-imaging. I also discussed the difference between
imaging and non-imaging ultrasound, according to the CPT definition, and
provided the appropriate coding for checking residual urine according to CPT
definition and current CMS rules. There was a strong recommendation to keep an
eye out for a CMS directive or local carrier medical review policy (LMRP) that
would crosswalk the original G0050 code to the 51798, again directing us to use
51798 code for checking residual regardless of the type of ultrasound being
used.
At the AUA annual meeting, the Health
Policy council recommended that, if the intent of your exam is to check
residual urine, then you should use the 51798 code whether you are using an
imaging or non-imaging machine. The council felt that the radiological (76775
or 76857) code should be reserved for exams in which the intent was to
ultrasound the bladder wall.
In those cases, the bladder would be
purposefully filled with fluid or urine as opposed to being
"post-void." If one performs an ultrasound post-voiding and there is
no residual urine, one cannot adequately check the bladder wall, etc.
According to AUA, recommended coding
would be 51798 for the check of residual urine for both the imaging and
non-imaging machine. My recommendations are to follow the AUA's
recommendations.
Follow
the hierarchy
There is a hierarchy of how urologists
should use rules to report their services.
- If CMS has a directive or the
carrier has an LMRP addressing the appropriate coding for a service, that
supersedes CPT and all other rules.
-
- If there is no specific LMRP or
directive, then the CPT rules are to be followed.
-
- If your specialty society
issues an opinion, these should be primarily considered.
-
- If you follow AUA
opinions/recommendations, there should be no accusations of fraud because
you have reasons to believe that is the correct interpretation.
-
I personally recommend the reporting of
services in the hierarchy as mentioned above. If AUA suggests any particular
coding, then I recommend that you follow those rules.
Disclaimer: The information in this column is
designed to be authoritative, and every effort has been made to ensure its
accuracy at the time it was written. However, readers are encouraged to check
with their individual carrier or private payers for updates and to confirm that
this information conforms to their specific rules.
Disclaimer:
The information in this column is designed to be authoritative, and every
effort has been made to ensure its accuracy at the time it was written.
However, readers are encouraged to check with their individual carrier or
private payers for updates and to confirm that this information conforms to
their specific rules.